Retrofit & Remediation

Our team has a history of working on remediation and retrofit projects across New Zealand. These projects involve schools, residential, commercial, mixed-use, and high-rise buildings. We have developed technical expertise in all scales of remediation projects.

The design solution for each project is tailored to the specific issues of each building, the requirements of stakeholders, budgets, and, most importantly, the needs of those who use the premises.

Our overarching approach is to consistently seek ways to add value to buildings while addressing the targeted remediation issues. We use various design tools to rejuvenate buildings, adding value and creating a contemporary look and feel that will stand the test of time.

We utilise bespoke and unique tools to manage the smooth delivery of projects across all elements under our control and beyond. We implement straightforward team management initiatives to ensure we operate in a highly collaborative and agile manner, allowing us to explore options and coordinate an integrated design response.

Blog 1 - Building Remediation: Why “Patch and Repair” Can Make Things Exponentially Worse

Blog 2 - Building Remediation: How to Build a Business Case Owners Can Say Yes To

Blog 3 - Building Remediation: How to Choose the Right Investigation Before You Choose a Solution

Blog 4 - Building Remediation A Practical Roadmap for Apartment Complex Building Retrofit & Remediation in Occupied Buildings

Blog 5 - Building Remediation: After Handover - How to Maintain Compliance and the Resilient Premium for 30 Years

See our projects

FAQS

What is architectural-led building remediation, and why does it matter for our Body Corporate?
Architectural-led remediation coordinates weathertightness, seismic, fire, and acoustic scopes into a single integrated design model before tender, preventing the trade conflicts and costly variations that plague contractor-led, discovery-on-site approaches.
How does Context reduce the risk of scope creep and variation claims during remediation?
We invest in a centimetre-accurate 3D survey and integrated design upfront, fencing the risk on-screen before scaffold goes up, so contractors tender against a defined scope rather than an open-ended discovery.
What is a Governance Baseline, and how does it protect committee members from personal liability?
A Governance Baseline is a frozen-in-time 3D digital record of the building's pre-contract condition, giving committees evidentiary proof of due diligence and blocking contractor claims that defects were pre-existing variations.
How does Context's approach help us maintain building insurability in a hardening insurance market?
Our digital diagnostic feeds a defensible Long-Term Maintenance Plan, providing the documentary evidence underwriters now demand to classify the asset as a managed risk rather than an uninsurable liability.
Can remediation be delivered while residents remain in occupation of the building? Yes - our integrated design sequences weathertightness, structural, and services works to minimise disruption, respect Residential Tenancies Act obligations around quiet enjoyment, and avoid the double-handling typical of trade-led repairs.
How does architectural-led remediation protect or restore our building's market value?
We bundle H1 energy efficiency, aesthetic modernisation, and compliance upgrades into the remediation scope, repositioning the asset from leaky-building stigma to a resilient, bankable property with restored saleability and mortgageability.
Why is a front-loaded diagnostic more cost-effective than a standard consultant-led assessment?
Quantifying scope on-screen through high-fidelity 3D capture is significantly faster and cheaper than discovering defects on scaffolding, where every unknown triggers variations, delay claims, and extended capital-works levy exposure.
How does Context's Governance Dashboard help a Body Corporate Committee meet its fiduciary duty?
The dashboard provides a 24/7 audit trail of risk registers, scope decisions, and documentary evidence, giving chairpersons and asset managers defensible proof of rigorous due diligence under the Unit Titles Act 2010.